Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 44B24604.1070607@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martjin, Greg, Marc, etc.:

> However, I think the other suggestions of having the listbot mangle the
> reply-tos of -patches and -committers to be -hackers would probably be
> good too. I myself subscribe to -committers in digest form (where I
> look at the summary to see if it's interesting) and read -patches
> occasionally via the archives to see if anything is there...

I agree that mangling the reply-tos would be the least complex (and thus 
probably best) solution.  Unlike attachment stripping, this is supported 
by majordomo.

However, to save on spam filtering, the reply-to should add -hackers 
*also*, not instead.

--Josh Berkus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: comparing record and record problem if first rec is from function
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?