On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Martjin, Greg, Marc, etc.:
>
>> However, I think the other suggestions of having the listbot mangle the
>> reply-tos of -patches and -committers to be -hackers would probably be
>> good too. I myself subscribe to -committers in digest form (where I
>> look at the summary to see if it's interesting) and read -patches
>> occasionally via the archives to see if anything is there...
>
> I agree that mangling the reply-tos would be the least complex (and thus
> probably best) solution. Unlike attachment stripping, this is supported by
> majordomo.
>
> However, to save on spam filtering, the reply-to should add -hackers *also*,
> not instead.
You've lost me on that last point ... how does that save on spam
filtering?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
