On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> On Sunday 09 July 2006 20:00, Greg Stark wrote:
>>> BIRT pgsql-patches should be abolished in favour of something else that
>>> accomplishes the bandwidth-reduction aspect without the downsides.
>
>> Alternatively, people could just use patches for patch submission and keep all
>> discussion on hackers.
>
> If this is chosen as the preferred path, we could get the list bot to
> add "Reply-To: pghackers" in pgsql-patches postings to help push
> discussions there. I'd vote for doing the same in pgsql-committers,
> which also gets its share of non-null discussion content.
that is a very easy and quick change ... but wasn't doing that brought up
before and alot of ppl were against that?
If nobody objects within, say, the next 24 hours ... ? I'll enabled that
one both ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
