Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 44B2BF09.1000605@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql-patches considered harmful  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc,

> You've lost me on that last point ... how does that save on spam filtering?

Many spam filters give points for "reply-to address does not match from 
address".

--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Warm-Standby using WAL archiving / Seperate pg_restorelog
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful