>A lot of Oracle guys came up to the booth and one of them asked specifically
>about table partitioning. He asked "when is it going to get done?" and "if we
>want to do it why aren't we canvassing the corporate world (or a particular
>company) to sponsor it?".
>
>
>
Interesting. Well I can tell you that Command Prompt routinely
pursues companies to help push features back into the source.
The ECPG changes we submitted and some upcoming ODBC features
are an example of this.
However what we have found is that most people running PostgreSQL
don't need table partitioning. We only have 3 customers that
would benefit from it.
Of course, now that I think about it I haven't talked to them
about the feature --- time to make some phone calls!
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Your input would be appreciated.
>
>Robert Bernier
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
