Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date
Msg-id 417FE2C0.4070109@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal  (Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
List pgsql-www
>
>
> Well, that's a call for the design pros.  But take a look at leading
> mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc.  They're still
> hardcoded to 800.

Yes, and remarkably hard to read due to the amount of data they try to
squeeze into that space :). I am not saying we should not support
800x600, I am just saying that 1024x768 is probably a decent enough
constraint. If you are browsing the web in 800x600 you expect to have to
scroll a little (emphasis little).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Next
From: Mitch Pirtle
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal