Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's a call for the design pros. But take a look at leading
>> mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc. They're still
>> hardcoded to 800.
>
>
> Yes, and remarkably hard to read due to the amount of data they try to
> squeeze into that space :). I am not saying we should not support
> 800x600, I am just saying that 1024x768 is probably a decent enough
> constraint. If you are browsing the web in 800x600 you expect to have to
> scroll a little (emphasis little).
I don't mind scrolling down, but I dislike having to scroll side to side.
I have a large monitor, but typically don't maximize my brower.
Just FWIW!
Mark
