"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 18:47 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Oh, duh, makeItemLikeRegex() is expecting a plain JsonPathString,
>> and JsonPathParseItem.value.like_regex is set up for just a
>> constant pattern. We could no doubt fix that, but it's a bigger
>> lift than I was hoping.
> Not in a position to do it myself but we should confirm we aren't simply
> following the standard here, and if so decide whether we want to deviate.
Hmm ... looks like we *are* following the standard:
<JSON like_regex predicate> ::=
<JSON path wff> like_regex <JSON like_regex pattern>
[ flag <JSON like_regex flags> ]
<JSON like_regex pattern> ::=
<JSON path string literal>
<JSON like_regex flag> ::=
<JSON path string literal>
whereas "starts with" has
<JSON starts with predicate> ::=
<JSON starts with whole> starts with <JSON starts with initial>
<JSON starts with whole> ::=
<JSON path wff>
<JSON starts with initial> ::=
<JSON path wff>
The text mentions that "the second operand is permitted to be an SQL/JSON
sequence and to support existential semantics", whereas they evidently
don't want that for a regex pattern.
regards, tom lane