On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:37 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for thinking about this. Yeah, the existing _START flag does
> indeed seem to be enough. I'd been focusing on trying to control the
> redo point selection, but we just need to delay ProcessSyncRequests(),
> and we had a hammer for that already. Who wants to write the patch?
> It should be trivial, except for the comments.
>
> It's interesting that we'd stun the checkpointer just before we try to
> send it a request in a fixed size queue, but that's OK because we'll
> perform the fsync ourselves if the queue is full.
I don't understand what you mean about stunning the checkpointer, but
here are some patches.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com