Re: Quality of email postings - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Mike Ellsworth
Subject Re: Quality of email postings
Date
Msg-id 219951fd0708100413v1e51fe97rbcf3baef1a0bfaca@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quality of email postings  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Quality of email postings
Re: Quality of email postings
List pgsql-advocacy
On 8/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > See my other posting about suggestions to improve things.  Obviously I
> > realize this is open source and lots of issues are going to come up, but
> > the question is whether there is room for improvement and whether more
> > leadership and self-policing will improve things.
>
> Well "leadership" in this vein is a red herring unless you want to start
> moderating. Self policing is something that we *all* should do better.

The provided description of Advocacy is: "PostgreSQL vs. the rest. Promotional ideas, etc.",
and would seem to be a good place to start.  Change 'description' to Objective.  Restate the sentence as an Objective. Set specific, chewable, sub-objectives.  Then add in the Promotional ideas to achieve each specific objective.  Develop very specific task lists (similar to a Roadmap). Get volunteer(s).  Then do it and attempt to measure results.

Anytime I see "etc." in any sentence, to me it means "wing it".  I brought up the same general thread a few years ago. There is no Marketing Plan.  Until there is, the Advocacy list will remain an exercise in "etc.".  At the time I was told (+ - ), "don't go there."

Man 1: "Can you give me some directions?"
Man 2: "Sure, what's your destination?"
Man 1: "Damned if I know."
Man 2: "There's your answer.".


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Bernier
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings