Re: Quality of email postings - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Quality of email postings
Date
Msg-id 874pj7wm4u.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Quality of email postings  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Quality of email postings  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Quality of email postings  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Quality of email postings  ("Gavin M. Roy" <gmr@myyearbook.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
> advocacy list.  It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions.  I am
> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
> and more focus in emails.

I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Mike Ellsworth"
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings