Re: Quality of email postings - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Quality of email postings
Date
Msg-id 46BC6C74.3070708@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quality of email postings  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Quality of email postings
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>
>> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
>> advocacy list.  It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
>> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions.  I am
>> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
>> and more focus in emails.
>
> I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
> Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
> and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
> appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.

I can only assume that this is a joke but with Greg I can never tell. :P

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGvGx0ATb/zqfZUUQRAkprAJ9DzxNOfz6XXznEPhWF7++uUbD00wCgjttv
Q/E8Z8VZN3+CY4H5UDl7k1Y=
=gt0A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings