Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20200304130530.GO2593@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name andpgbench  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> No objection. I did not know there was such a thing…
>
> Maybe a more detailed explanation about PG_COLOR could be stored somewhere,
> and all affected tools could link to it? Or not.

One argument against that position is that each tool may just handle a
subset of the full set available, and that some of the subsets may
partially intersect.  Fun.

> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
> environment variables, as it is also missing?

Yeah, that's true.  Let's fix this part while on it.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Erase the distinctClause if the result is unique by definition