Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20200305072655.GW2593@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:05:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
>> environment variables, as it is also missing?
>
> Yeah, that's true.  Let's fix this part while on it.

So, combining the feedback from Fabien, Juan and Daniel I am finishing
with the attached.  Any thoughts?
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Identifying user-created objects