Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 1FC3F2B4-8424-48B6-A792-F58EB4F2B799@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 5 Mar 2020, at 08:26, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:05:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
>>> environment variables, as it is also missing?
>>
>> Yeah, that's true.  Let's fix this part while on it.
>
> So, combining the feedback from Fabien, Juan and Daniel I am finishing
> with the attached.  Any thoughts?

LGTM

cheers ./daniel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.