Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name andpgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name andpgbench
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.2003041117110.11142@pseudo
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bonjour Michaël,

> All the tools mentioned in $subject have been switched recently to use
> the central logging infrastructure, which means that they have gained
> coloring output.  However we (mostly I) forgot to update the docs.
>
> Attached is a patch to fix this issue.  Please let me know if there
> are comments and/or objections.

No objection. I did not know there was such a thing…

Maybe a more detailed explanation about PG_COLOR could be stored 
somewhere, and all affected tools could link to it? Or not.

For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq 
environment variables, as it is also missing?

-- 
Fabien.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: tushar
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication empty transactions