Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20200304130139.GN2593@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:22:26AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> I think there are a couple tools missing: pg_archivecleanup, pg_ctl,
> pg_test_fsync and pg_upgrade. pg_regress also, but there is nothing to do
> in the documentation with it.

Indeed, true for pg_archivecleanup and pg_test_fsync, but not for
pg_ctl and pg_upgrade.  The funny part about pg_ctl is that the
initialization is done for nothing, because nothing is actually logged
with the APIs of logging.c.  pg_upgrade uses its own logging APIs,
which have nothing to do with logging.c.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench