Re: [WIP] Reduce alignment requirements on 64-bit systems. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [WIP] Reduce alignment requirements on 64-bit systems.
Date
Msg-id 200901081641.n08GfJ410250@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [WIP] Reduce alignment requirements on 64-bit systems.  ("Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [WIP] Reduce alignment requirements on 64-bit systems.
List pgsql-hackers
Added to TODO:
Reduce data row alignment requirements on some 64-bit systems    *
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-10/msg00369.php
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ryan Bradetich wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Here is a proof-of-concept patch for reducing the alignment
> requirement for heap tuples on 64-bit systems.
> This patch passes the regression tests and a couple of other data sets
> I have thrown at it.
> 
> I am hoping to get some early feedback on this patch so I have time to
> make any corrections, improvements,
> etc before the November commit-fest deadline.
> 
> There are two visible savings in the system catalogs using this patch
> (size was gathered using \S+):
> 
> Catalog              Pre-Patch Size      After Patch Size
> 
> pg_depend         312 kB                  296 kB
> pg_description    160 kB                  152 kB
> 
> 
> One thing I am considering, but I am not sure if it is worth the code
> uglification, is to wrap the majority of these
> checks in #ifdefs so they only are used on 64-bit systems.   This
> would completely eliminate the impact for this
> patch on 32-bit systems, which would not gain any benefit from this patch.
> 
> Feedback welcome!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Ryan

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql