Re: Conventions for release numbering - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Conventions for release numbering
Date
Msg-id 20050612231145.X90456@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Conventions for release numbering  (elein@varlena.com (elein))
Responses Re: Conventions for release numbering
List pgsql-advocacy
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, elein wrote:

> (No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)
>
>
> If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
> 0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
> how would we refer to a generic release number:
>
>     postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?
>
> Is this our convention?  Do either of these work?

Assuming v==version and r==release, is there a big difference between the
two?  How are each defined?


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: elein@varlena.com (elein)
Date:
Subject: Conventions for release numbering
Next
From: elein@varlena.com (elein)
Date:
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering