Conventions for release numbering - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From elein@varlena.com (elein)
Subject Conventions for release numbering
Date
Msg-id 20050613013808.GU17206@varlena.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Conventions for release numbering  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
(No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)


If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
how would we refer to a generic release number:

    postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?

Is this our convention?  Do either of these work?

I just want to know what our convention might be.

--elein

============================================================
elein@varlena.com        Varlena, LLC        www.varlena.com

          PostgreSQL Consulting, Support & Training

PostgreSQL General Bits   http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
=============================================================
I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Tino Wildenhain
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux Journal 2005 awards
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering