Re: Conventions for release numbering - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From elein@varlena.com (elein)
Subject Re: Conventions for release numbering
Date
Msg-id 20050613023818.GW17206@varlena.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conventions for release numbering  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Conventions for release numbering
List pgsql-advocacy
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:13:15PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, elein wrote:
>
> >(No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)
> >
> >
> >If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
> >0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
> >how would we refer to a generic release number:
> >
> >    postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?
> >
> >Is this our convention?  Do either of these work?
>
> Assuming v==version and r==release, is there a big difference between the
> two?  How are each defined?

That is my question!  What do we conventionally use?

>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
>

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering