Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 200311171535.13307.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
List pgsql-advocacy
Peter,

> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
> least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
> have to come up with better reasons.

Yeah, I'm more interested in ARC and replication ... and the SQL
standardization that just went into 7.4.

 > Also note that most major number
> changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> the project has moved to a new phase.  I don't see any such move
> happening.

Now that is interesting.  I missed that.   Can you explain how that worked
with 7.0?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?