Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180027190.639-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus writes:

> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?

As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
have to come up with better reasons.  Also note that most major number
changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
the project has moved to a new phase.  I don't see any such move
happening.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?