Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171546330.6852-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Hello,

  If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
appropriate.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Of course, while I was editing press releases at 2am, I started thinking about
> our next version.   It seems certain that the next release, in 6-9 months,
> will have at a minimum the Windows port and ARC, if not Slony-I as well.
>
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?    Seems like
> even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0.
>
> I'm posting this to both Advocacy and Hackers because I think that some people
> will have rather different points of view on the issue.   But I wanted to
> start a discussion early this time.  No flamewars, please!   We all want
> PostgreSQL to be the best possible database.
>
>

--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: William Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?