Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date
Msg-id 1843.1195243549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> We are making a mountain out of a molehill here. We've managed to get 
> this right for years with very little fuss. Why make infrastructure to 
> handle a problem that is at most marginal? I have more pressing concerns 
> that building an autoconf step into buildfarm.

I think that trying to get configure.in to work with arbitrary versions
of autoconf is probably not a very useful expenditure of time, anyway.

What we *do* need is some way of checking whether the right autoconf
version was used in any particular branch; right now we simply rely on
committers to get it right, and it's an easy thing to mess up.

Bruce's suggestion of somehow checking this in the top Makefile is
a possibility, but even better would be if creating configure from
configure.in failed outright.  We have an AC_PREREQ in there that
fails if autoconf is too old, but can we tighten it to also complain
if too new?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST crash recovery (potential problems?)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgtranslation-translators] Call for translations