Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date
Msg-id 200711162231.13923.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce's suggestion of somehow checking this in the top Makefile is
> a possibility, but even better would be if creating configure from
> configure.in failed outright.  We have an AC_PREREQ in there that
> fails if autoconf is too old, but can we tighten it to also complain
> if too new?

Yes:

diff -ur ../cvs-pgsql/configure.in ./configure.in
--- ../cvs-pgsql/configure.in   2007-11-16 21:25:10.000000000 +0100
+++ ./configure.in      2007-11-16 22:27:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
AC_INIT([PostgreSQL], [8.3beta3], [pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org])

-AC_PREREQ(2.59)
+m4_if(m4_defn([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION]), [2.59], [], [m4_fatal([Autoconf version 2.59 is
required])])AC_COPYRIGHT([Copyright(c) 1996-2007, PostgreSQL Global Development
Group])AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([src/backend/access/common/heaptuple.c])AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(config)

This appears to work with 2.53, 2.59, and 2.61, which are the ones that
affect us at the moment.  I can backpatch this all the way to 7.3 if desired.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgtranslation-translators] Call for translations
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgtranslation-translators] Call for translations