9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 1458655662.32508.11.camel@gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>)
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Jonathan Katz <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>)
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>)
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Hi,

I've been ranting about this on Twitter for a while, and now blogged about it:

http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/89-9.6,-or-10.0.html

There are major changes in 9.6 (some of them are listed in the blog post), and
I think they are good enough to call this 10.0.

A counter argument might be waiting for pglogical for inclusion, but I think
the current changes are enough to warrant a .0 release.

What do you think?

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR



Attachment

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Save the Date: PgConf Silicon Valley 2016
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0