Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The real problem is perhaps that the message gives no hint that it's
>> talking about being unable to establish an IPv6 socket. With that hint,
>> perhaps people would realize that it's not a problem.
> Not sure who took it out, but it gone. The original message was:
> elog(LOG, "IPv6 support disabled --- perhaps the kernel does not support IPv6");
That seems both wordy and not necessarily accurate. What I had in mind
was more like
"could not create IPv6 socket: %m"
But I still wonder whether we shouldn't suppress the message entirely,
at least for EAFNOSUPPORT errors.
regards, tom lane