Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > There was a big discussion over whether we should require IPv6 to be
> > enabled individually, and then throw a hard error if IPv6 fails, but at
> > this stage, it seemed best to most to just try IPv6 and soft-fail, while
> > throwing a message in the server logs.
>
> The real problem is perhaps that the message gives no hint that it's
> talking about being unable to establish an IPv6 socket. With that hint,
> perhaps people would realize that it's not a problem.
>
Yes, that was my point, that in the initial message wording I had
mentioned IPv6, and the fact that it wasn't enabled in the kernel.
Not sure who took it out, but it gone. The original message was:
elog(LOG, "IPv6 support disabled --- perhaps the kernel does not support IPv6");
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
