Thread: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

Hi,

I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
tiny patch for that.

Thoughts?

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

On 2021/11/05 14:52, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
> comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
> to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
> tiny patch for that.
> 
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago..  And the patch was fine on
consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.
--
Michael

On 2021/11/09 13:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
> 
> I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
> because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
> bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago..

:)


>  And the patch was fine on
> consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION