Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Date
Msg-id 1f4d16ff-27c0-893e-0b17-5534d1f1d960@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

On 2021/11/05 14:52, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
> comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
> to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
> tiny patch for that.
> 
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_statements Configuration Parameters Documentation
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments