Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Date
Msg-id 54723fc8-46e6-ee4d-aa93-e932506302a3@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

On 2021/11/09 13:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
> 
> I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
> because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
> bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago..

:)


>  And the patch was fine on
> consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side