Thread: Missing const in DSA.
While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const.
Attachment
Mark G <markg735@gmail.com> writes: > While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that > dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const. +1 ... also, given the contents of the array, "char" seems like rather a misnomer. I'd be happier if it were declared as uint8, say. regards, tom lane
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Mark G <markg735@gmail.com> writes: > > While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that > > dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const. > > +1 ... also, given the contents of the array, "char" seems like > rather a misnomer. I'd be happier if it were declared as uint8, say. +1 -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Mark G <markg735@gmail.com> writes: >>> While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that >>> dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const. >> +1 ... also, given the contents of the array, "char" seems like >> rather a misnomer. I'd be happier if it were declared as uint8, say. > +1 Are you planning to take care of this? regards, tom lane
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:17 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Mark G <markg735@gmail.com> writes: > >>> While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that > >>> dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const. > > >> +1 ... also, given the contents of the array, "char" seems like > >> rather a misnomer. I'd be happier if it were declared as uint8, say. > > > +1 > > Are you planning to take care of this? Will do. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:46 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:17 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > >> Mark G <markg735@gmail.com> writes: > > >>> While looking at some of the recent churn in DSA I noticed that > > >>> dsa_size_class_map should probably be declared const. > > > > >> +1 ... also, given the contents of the array, "char" seems like > > >> rather a misnomer. I'd be happier if it were declared as uint8, say. Pushed. Thanks both for the code review! -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com