Thread: [HACKERS] Do we create a new roadmap page for development?
Hello, I'd like to share our roadmap for PostgreSQL development, as other companies and individuals do in the following page. Butthis page is for PostgreSQL 10. PostgreSQL10 Roadmap https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL10_Roadmap Should I create a page for PostgreSQL 11 likewise? Or, do you want a more stable page named "PostgreSQL Roadmap" insteadof "PostgreSQL11 Roadmap" and attach the target version to each feature as in "Feature X (V11)", so that we can representmore longer-term goals? And, why don't we add a link to the above roadmap page in the "Development information" page? Development information https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > I'd like to share our roadmap for PostgreSQL development, as other companies and individuals do in the following page. But this page is for PostgreSQL 10. > > PostgreSQL10 Roadmap > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL10_Roadmap > > Should I create a page for PostgreSQL 11 likewise? Or, do you want a more stable page named "PostgreSQL Roadmap" insteadof "PostgreSQL11 Roadmap" and attach the target version to each feature as in "Feature X (V11)", so that we can representmore longer-term goals? I think a page that's just called PostgreSQL Roadmap will get out of date pretty quickly. Ultimately it'll end up like the TODO list, which is not really a list of things TO DO. The advantage of the version-specific pages is that old information kind of ages its way out of the system. > And, why don't we add a link to the above roadmap page in the "Development information" page? > > Development information > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information I'm sure nobody will object to you doing that. It's a wiki, and intended to be edited. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Should I create a page for PostgreSQL 11 likewise? Or, do you want a > more stable page named "PostgreSQL Roadmap" instead of "PostgreSQL11 > Roadmap" and attach the target version to each feature as in "Feature X > (V11)", so that we can represent more longer-term goals? > > I think a page that's just called PostgreSQL Roadmap will get out of date > pretty quickly. Ultimately it'll end up like the TODO list, which is not > really a list of things TO DO. The advantage of the version-specific pages > is that old information kind of ages its way out of the system. Maybe so. I created a page for PostgreSQL 11 and add a link to our roadmap: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL11_Roadmap Please add your roadmaps when you can. > > And, why don't we add a link to the above roadmap page in the "Development > information" page? > > > > Development information > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information > > I'm sure nobody will object to you doing that. It's a wiki, and intended > to be edited. Thanks, done. Also, I moved the existing the link to "Development projects" from " Past PgCon Developer Meeting Notes" tothe new header "Roadmaps and Projects", because the development projects page doesn't appear to fit the PGCON notes. Regards Takayuki