Thread: Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> I had a look into the history on the CommitFest page.  It looks like
> Alvaro unintentionally clobbered the previous five edits, which went
> back about four hours.  I've restored those changes now, but it is
> definitely worrying that such a drastic regression could occur.

We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the CommitFest:March
page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is something very broken about
the copy of mediawiki we are using --- would someone look into that?
        regards, tom lane


Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Tom Lane escribió:
> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> > I had a look into the history on the CommitFest page.  It looks like
> > Alvaro unintentionally clobbered the previous five edits, which went
> > back about four hours.  I've restored those changes now, but it is
> > definitely worrying that such a drastic regression could occur.
> 
> We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the CommitFest:March
> page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is something very broken about
> the copy of mediawiki we are using --- would someone look into that?

Hmm, perhaps it is the Postgres port that's broken.  It wouldn't be
really surprising that people mostly use the MySQL port ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi�:
>> We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the CommitFest:March
>> page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is something very broken about
>> the copy of mediawiki we are using --- would someone look into that?

> Hmm, perhaps it is the Postgres port that's broken.  It wouldn't be
> really surprising that people mostly use the MySQL port ...

Conflict detection not working, perhaps?  Wouldn't be too surprising.
But right now I'm just asking that somebody from -www find out exactly
what version we are running.
        regards, tom lane


Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:35:41 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Tom Lane escribió:
> > "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> > > I had a look into the history on the CommitFest page.  It looks
> > > like Alvaro unintentionally clobbered the previous five edits,
> > > which went back about four hours.  I've restored those changes
> > > now, but it is definitely worrying that such a drastic regression
> > > could occur.
> > 
> > We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the
> > CommitFest:March page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is
> > something very broken about the copy of mediawiki we are using ---
> > would someone look into that?
> 
> Hmm, perhaps it is the Postgres port that's broken.  It wouldn't be
> really surprising that people mostly use the MySQL port ...

It could be, or it could be that the postgres port on 8.3 is broken :).
I don't know which version we installed for wiki, but in order to get
mediawiki running for postgresqldocs, I had to use HEAD of mediawiki.
However I note that Greg submitted his 8.3 compatibility before the
latest release of mediawiki which is 1.12.0.

In theory, we should be fine in that regard.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
Magnus Hagander
Date:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane escribió:
> >> We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the
> >> CommitFest:March page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is
> >> something very broken about the copy of mediawiki we are using ---
> >> would someone look into that?
>
> > Hmm, perhaps it is the Postgres port that's broken.  It wouldn't be
> > really surprising that people mostly use the MySQL port ...
>
> Conflict detection not working, perhaps?  Wouldn't be too surprising.
> But right now I'm just asking that somebody from -www find out exactly
> what version we are running.

That's easy enough: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Special:Version

So we're on 1.12alpha (r31813)

Now what that actually *means* is a whole different question :-) I
don't know mediawiki nearly well enough to commment.

//Magnus


Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>>> We saw this type of thing happen more than once on the
>>>> CommitFest:March page, if memory serves.  Apparently there is
>>>> something very broken about the copy of mediawiki we are using ---
>>>> would someone look into that?
>>> Hmm, perhaps it is the Postgres port that's broken.  It wouldn't be
>>> really surprising that people mostly use the MySQL port ...
>> Conflict detection not working, perhaps?  Wouldn't be too surprising.
>> But right now I'm just asking that somebody from -www find out exactly
>> what version we are running.
> 
> That's easy enough: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Special:Version
> 
> So we're on 1.12alpha (r31813)
> 
> Now what that actually *means* is a whole different question :-) I
> don't know mediawiki nearly well enough to commment.

we are running a mediawiki version from the 1_12 branch downloaded about 
1-2 weeks before it got released as 1.12. upgrading to the final release 
is an open ticket on pmt but I don't think there are many changes 
between our version and the current release.


Stefan


Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest Wiki page annoyance

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:52:02 +0200
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

> That's easy enough: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Special:Version
> 
> So we're on 1.12alpha (r31813)
> 
> Now what that actually *means* is a whole different question :-) I
> don't know mediawiki nearly well enough to commment.

O.k. the latest is 1:12.0 stable... we need to get that updated.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> //Magnus
> 


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate