Thread: constants in 2-column foreign keys or how to design a storage for text-groups ?

Hi,
my frontend has a lot of combo- and listboxes where one can chose a 
textsnippet that represents a key-number which is stored in several 
tables as foreign-key attributes.
Those textsnippets are usually semantically grouped in 2-10 strings that 
belong together somehow.

stupid example:
---------------
color:   red, green, blue
size: tiny, little, big, giant
structure:  hard, soft, floppy

now I'd like to build tables like
thing( color_fk foreign key to color, size_fk foreign key to size, 
structure_fk foreign key to structure, sometext, atimestamp ...)
so far no problems.

With time those little text-list-tables clutter up the database so I'm 
thinking about one big text-storage that has the groups represented by a 
number like:
snippets (snippet_id, snippet_group_nr, snippet)
(100, 1, red), (101, 1, green), (102, 1, blue), (200, 2, tiny), (201, 2, 
little), ...

Simple foreign-keys still work nicely but they cant prohibit that I 
store id-values from wrong groups.
Here color_fk would only be correct if the id is out of group 1. The 
foreign key doesnt catch it if I put a group-3-id into color_fk.

Id be cool to be able to have constants in 2-column foreign keys like
color_fk integer not null default 0
FOREIGN KEY (color_fk,  1  ) REFERENCES snippets (snippet_id, 
snippet_group_nr)

This throws an error. So this approach might be not advisable.
I could add an additional column for every foreign-key that stores 
constant group-ids then I can have 2-column-fk but this looks bloated 
since those extra columns would hold eternally the same number in every row.

How would I solve the rather common text storage issue?




On 2009-12-09, Andreas <maps.on@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,

...
> stupid example:
> ---------------
> color:   red, green, blue
> size: tiny, little, big, giant
> structure:  hard, soft, floppy
>

> How would I solve the rather common text storage issue?

have you considered using enumerated types instead?



Jasen Betts schrieb:
> On 2009-12-09, Andreas <maps.on@gmx.net> wrote:
> ...
>   
>> stupid example:
>> ---------------
>> color:   red, green, blue
>> size: tiny, little, big, giant
>> structure:  hard, soft, floppy
>> How would I solve the rather common text storage issue?
>>     
>
> have you considered using enumerated types instead?
Yes, but I need those texts in the GUI to show them as listboxes or 
comboboxes.
There might be changes too when I later need to add or drop an option of 
a group.

E.g. there are questionnaires to model.
Lets say 10 questions where each has a couple of predefined answers 
where one should be selected.
So I've got to store every group of possible answers to a question 
either in a seperate table or in a kind of repository all within one big 
table (row_id, questionnare_id, question_id, answer_nr, answer)
The row_id so I just need to store 1 value per answer.

Now I've got to make sure that it is impossible that accidentally there 
gets a question-17 answer connected to a question-42 and above all, that 
the questions dont get mixed between the questionnaires.

I can do this with the frontend and enough hope that nothing bad will 
happen.
Still I'd rather hardwire the integrity into the table design.