Thread: Fedora 22
Hello,
I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly released Fedora?
For instance - for fedora 22 packages would that be:
fedora 22 release date + 1 week?
(granted the Fedora 22 release occurred today, so I am just looking for in general I should look for it by...) guidance.
And thanks for the hard work on packaging and other work you do.
Hi, On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:02 +0000, jared wrote: > I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly > released Fedora? > http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/fedora/ The problem is I missed Fedora 22 release date :( Just working on the new build server. I believe I can push the new packages starting tomorrow. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
On 05/27/2015 03:24 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:02 +0000, jared wrote: >> I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly >> released Fedora? >> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/fedora/ > The problem is I missed Fedora 22 release date :( Just working on the > new build server. I believe I can push the new packages starting > tomorrow. > > Regards, Hello Devrim, Possible to build postgresql 9.2 packages also for Fedora 22 ? -- Thanks Yogesh
Attachment
Hi, On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 21:18 -0700, Yogesh Sharma wrote: > Possible to build postgresql 9.2 packages also for Fedora 22 ? Fedora 21 used PostgreSQL 9.3, so I am not inclined to build 9.2 for Fedora 22, unless there is a strong demand for that. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Attachment
Hello, I noticed the packages have landed for fedora 22.
When I try to install them it says:
Error: Package <package name here> is not signed
Do you know if that is an issue with the repository having unsigned packages - or is that a local issue where my dnf has not properly imported a key?
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:02 +0000, jared wrote:
> I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly
> released Fedora?
> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/fedora/
The problem is I missed Fedora 22 release date :( Just working on the
new build server. I believe I can push the new packages starting
tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Due to an unsolved issue current packages are pushed without gpg signing.
you can pass --nogpg option to dnf or yum command.
you can pass --nogpg option to dnf or yum command.
On 07/07/2015 11:32 AM, jared wrote:
Hello, I noticed the packages have landed for fedora 22.When I try to install them it says:Error: Package <package name here> is not signedDo you know if that is an issue with the repository having unsigned packages - or is that a local issue where my dnf has not properly imported a key?On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:Hi,
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:02 +0000, jared wrote:
> I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly
> released Fedora?
> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/fedora/
The problem is I missed Fedora 22 release date :( Just working on the
new build server. I believe I can push the new packages starting
tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
-- Kind Regards, Yogesh Sharma credativ LLC 270 E Douglas Ave, El Cajon, CA 92020 Office: +1 619 270 8787 Direct: +1 619 639 4543 ======================================= USA: http://www.credativ.us --------------------------------------- Global: http://www.credativ.com Germany: http://www.credativ.de UK: http://www.credativ.co.uk Canada: http://www.credativ.ca India: http://www.credativ.in Netherlands: http://www.credativ.nl =======================================
Attachment
thanks again.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:36 PM Yogesh Sharma <yogeshsharma.credativ@gmail.com> wrote:
Due to an unsolved issue current packages are pushed without gpg signing.
you can pass --nogpg option to dnf or yum command.On 07/07/2015 11:32 AM, jared wrote:Hello, I noticed the packages have landed for fedora 22.When I try to install them it says:Error: Package <package name here> is not signedDo you know if that is an issue with the repository having unsigned packages - or is that a local issue where my dnf has not properly imported a key?On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:Hi,
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:02 +0000, jared wrote:
> I am wondering what the usual delay is on packages for a newly
> released Fedora?
> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/fedora/
The problem is I missed Fedora 22 release date :( Just working on the
new build server. I believe I can push the new packages starting
tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR-- Kind Regards, Yogesh Sharma credativ LLC 270 E Douglas Ave, El Cajon, CA 92020 Office: +1 619 270 8787 Direct: +1 619 639 4543 ======================================= USA: http://www.credativ.us --------------------------------------- Global: http://www.credativ.com Germany: http://www.credativ.de UK: http://www.credativ.co.uk Canada: http://www.credativ.ca India: http://www.credativ.in Netherlands: http://www.credativ.nl =======================================
Hi, On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 18:32 +0000, jared wrote: > When I try to install them it says: > > Error: Package <package name here> is not signed > > Do you know if that is an issue with the repository having unsigned > packages - or is that a local issue where my dnf has not properly > imported a key? Update on this: I just pushed updated packages that are all signed. Fixed the issue with the rpm signing on Fedora 22 boxes. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
El 09/07/15 a las 08:47, Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 18:32 +0000, jared wrote: >> When I try to install them it says: >> >> Error: Package <package name here> is not signed >> >> Do you know if that is an issue with the repository having unsigned >> packages - or is that a local issue where my dnf has not properly >> imported a key? > > Update on this: I just pushed updated packages that are all signed. > Fixed the issue with the rpm signing on Fedora 22 boxes. Something is not right. Is it possible that the yum.postgresql.org site is outdated or that there's missing information? http://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php Only packages for F22 are the PG 9.5 ones. Also, running fedup errors out with this: Downloading failed: El paquete pgbouncer-1.5.5-2.f22.x86_64.rpm no está firmado (sorry that it's in Spanish. It says the package is not signed) Trying to install http://yum.postgresql.org/9.5/fedora/fedora-22-x86_64/pgdg-fedora95-9.5-1.noarch.rpm I get that that package is not signed as well. Is it possible I'm looking in the wrong place? Regards, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Hi, On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:40 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote: > Something is not right. Is it possible that the yum.postgresql.org > site is outdated or that there's missing information? > > http://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php > > Only packages for F22 are the PG 9.5 ones. Fixed. > Also, running fedup errors out with this: > > Downloading failed: El paquete pgbouncer-1.5.5-2.f22.x86_64.rpm no > está > firmado > > (sorry that it's in Spanish. It says the package is not signed) > > Trying to install > http://yum.postgresql.org/9.5/fedora/fedora-22-x86_64/pgdg-fedora95-9 > .5-1.noarch.rpm > I get that that package is not signed as well. > > > Is it possible I'm looking in the wrong place? I think the link is outdated as well. Just updated the URL above so that it points to the correct repo package (which is signed) Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
El 26/08/15 a las 07:17, Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió: > >> Also, running fedup errors out with this: >> >> Downloading failed: El paquete pgbouncer-1.5.5-2.f22.x86_64.rpm no >> está >> firmado >> >> (sorry that it's in Spanish. It says the package is not signed) >> >> Trying to install >> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.5/fedora/fedora-22-x86_64/pgdg-fedora95-9 >> .5-1.noarch.rpm >> I get that that package is not signed as well. >> >> >> Is it possible I'm looking in the wrong place? > > I think the link is outdated as well. Just updated the URL above so > that it points to the correct repo package (which is signed) This wasn't solved and I'm getting the same error, but with the postgresql package now: Downloading failed: Package postgresql93-server-9.3.9-1PGDG.f22.x86_64.rpm is not signed Regards, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Hi, On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 20:23 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote: > This wasn't solved and I'm getting the same error, but with the > postgresql package now: > > Downloading failed: Package > postgresql93-server-9.3.9-1PGDG.f22.x86_64.rpm is not signed Sorry, but I could not duplicate this on my desktop machine that I upgraded to Fedora 22 last week :( Did you run dnf clean all Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
This isn't working:
[root@endor ~]# dnf clean all
Cleaning repos: pgdg93 pgdg94 google-talkplugin fedora
icinga-stable-release rpmfusion-free-updates fedora-chromium
adobe-linux-x86_64 rpmfusion-free
: rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
postgresql-bdr94-2ndquadrant-fedora updates google-chrome
rpmfusion-nonfree
Cleaning up Everything
[root@endor ~]# fedup-cli --network 22
setting up repos...
getting boot images...
.treeinfo.signed
| 2.0 kB 00:00:00
setting up update...
[....]
Downloading failed: Package check_postgres-2.22.0-1.f22.noarch.rpm is not signed
2015-10-12 16:36 GMT-03:00 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 20:23 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
>> This wasn't solved and I'm getting the same error, but with the
>> postgresql package now:
>>
>> Downloading failed: Package
>> postgresql93-server-9.3.9-1PGDG.f22.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
> Sorry, but I could not duplicate this on my desktop machine that I
> upgraded to Fedora 22 last week :(
>
> Did you run
>
> dnf clean all
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>
>
>
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services