Thread: 8.3 build 603 build error on Fedora 8
Hi, Attached is the build error of build 603 on Fedora 8. I'm not a JDBC guy. How can it be fixed? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Attachment
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Devrim G�ND�Z wrote: > Attached is the build error of build 603 on Fedora 8. I'm not a JDBC > guy. How can it be fixed? > It appears that the replace processing that's used to transform Driver.java.in to Driver.java is not working. What's your version of ant and the JDK? Could you send "ant -verbose" output? Kris Jurka
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 13:39 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > What's your version of ant and the JDK? $ rpm -qv ant ant-1.7.0-1jpp.2.fc8 I'm using IcedTea, the Java Platform that Fedora ships. > Could you send "ant -verbose" output? Attached. Just a FYI: I could compile build 602 on the same environment... Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Attachment
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:51 -0800, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Just a FYI: I could compile build 602 on the same environment... I just remembered that Java environment on my laptop is broken. I tested this release on another Fedora 8, and it worked well. Sorry for the noise. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Attachment
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Devrim G�ND�Z wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 13:39 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: > >> What's your version of ant and the JDK? > > $ rpm -qv ant > ant-1.7.0-1jpp.2.fc8 > > I'm using IcedTea, the Java Platform that Fedora ships. > We determine which version of the driver to build based on the JVM we're running in, so when I see this "/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre", I'm guessing it's reporting itself as a 1.7 JVM while we only know about 1.6 and less. Perhaps this patch will help? Kris Jurka
Attachment
Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes:
> We determine which version of the driver to build based on the JVM we're
> running in, so when I see this
> "/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre", I'm guessing it's reporting
> itself as a 1.7 JVM while we only know about 1.6 and less. Perhaps this
> patch will help?
I'm not sure how Devrim got around it, but on my Fedora 8 machine this
patch is in fact necessary. The 8.2 driver doesn't build without it
anymore, either (probably true all the way back, but 8.2 and 8.3 are
the only ones I tested).
regards, tom lane
Hi, On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 12:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not sure how Devrim got around it, but on my Fedora 8 machine this > patch is in fact necessary. The 8.2 driver doesn't build without it > anymore, either I did not add any patch. This build can be built cleanly on my boxes without any patches: http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.3/fedora/fedora-8-i386/repoview/postgresql-jdbc.html Same is valid for 8.2: http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.2/fedora/fedora-8-i386/repoview/postgresql-jdbc.html (The failed box is my laptop, and is broken on Java builds, which I'm aware...) Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Attachment
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
> (The failed box is my laptop, and is broken on Java builds, which I'm
> aware...)
Well, if "broken" means "out-of-the-box Fedora 8 Java installation",
then that accords with my results ;-). Anyway I suggest Kris apply
that patch; it's certainly not going to break any machine where JDBC
builds now.
regards, tom lane
Hi, On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 12:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, if "broken" means "out-of-the-box Fedora 8 Java installation", > then that accords with my results ;-) :-) No, actually "out-of-the-box Fedora 8 Java installation" is not broken, at least in my buildfarm instances. What happens when you do a scratch build at koji? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Attachment
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not sure how Devrim got around it, but on my Fedora 8 machine this > patch is in fact necessary. The 8.2 driver doesn't build without it > anymore, either (probably true all the way back, but 8.2 and 8.3 are > the only ones I tested). > I've applied this patch to 8.2+. 8.1 and earlier won't build with this version of Java, but I've now made it report a useful error message rather than strange errors all over the place. To all driver versions I've added an explicit check to bail out if it finds a Java version that it doesn't know what to do with. Kris Jurka