Thread: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants

[PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants

From
Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
While working with postgres code, I found that for gist index number of
amsupport procs are defined two times. First in src/include/access/gist.h

#define GISTNProcs                  9

and second in src/backend/access/gist/gist.c

    amroutine->amsupport = 9;

I think this number should be specified only once, in .h file.

So I would offer a patch for all access methods. That changes amsupport and
amstrategies from numbers to defined constants. (I've added two of them where
they were missing)

See attachment.

If it is good, I will add it to the commitfest.

--
Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
Attachment

Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Nikolay Shaplov
<n.shaplov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> While working with postgres code, I found that for gist index number of
> amsupport procs are defined two times. First in src/include/access/gist.h
>
> #define GISTNProcs                  9
>
> and second in src/backend/access/gist/gist.c
>
>         amroutine->amsupport = 9;
>
> I think this number should be specified only once, in .h file.

Yep, that sounds true.

> So I would offer a patch for all access methods. That changes amsupport and
> amstrategies from numbers to defined constants. (I've added two of them where
> they were missing)

It may be a good idea to make something similar for contrib/bloom if >
0 values are defined for amstrategies or amsupport for consistency.
-- 
Michael



Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants

From
Teodor Sigaev
Date:
>> I think this number should be specified only once, in .h file.
> Yep, that sounds true.
> It may be a good idea to make something similar for contrib/bloom if >
> 0 values are defined for amstrategies or amsupport for consistency.

Thank you, pushed.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/