Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ_00oQQBfrLpe7c4u=5vR8OFpU61pRGLxy+_RZT5tFnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants  (Nikolay Shaplov <n.shaplov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Nikolay Shaplov
<n.shaplov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> While working with postgres code, I found that for gist index number of
> amsupport procs are defined two times. First in src/include/access/gist.h
>
> #define GISTNProcs                  9
>
> and second in src/backend/access/gist/gist.c
>
>         amroutine->amsupport = 9;
>
> I think this number should be specified only once, in .h file.

Yep, that sounds true.

> So I would offer a patch for all access methods. That changes amsupport and
> amstrategies from numbers to defined constants. (I've added two of them where
> they were missing)

It may be a good idea to make something similar for contrib/bloom if >
0 values are defined for amstrategies or amsupport for consistency.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Unused macros in contrib code