Thread: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Yup, we're overdue for that, so:
After some discussion among core and the packagers list, we have
tentatively set June 9 as the release date for minor updates of
all supported PG release branches (back to 7.4). As has been the
recent practice, code freeze will occur the preceding Thursday, June 5.
If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
to get them finished up and sent in...
regards, tom lane
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time > to get them finished up and sent in... Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters. Regards, -- Guillaume
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
>> to get them finished up and sent in...
> Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.
No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time > >> to get them finished up and sent in... > > > Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been > > backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters. > > No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus, > do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2? I think everyone but me wanted it backpatched, so let's do it. I have posted both patches but I am unable to apply your additions becuause I don't understand them well enough. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus, > do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2? IIRC, noone voted against backpatching it after Alvaro and you agreed with doing so. Archives link: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-05/msg00243.php It would be nice to have it fixed in 8.3.2, even if it's not really blocking for the release. -- Guillaume
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
>> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
> I think everyone but me wanted it backpatched, so let's do it. I have
> posted both patches but I am unable to apply your additions becuause I
> don't understand them well enough.
IIRC I made a few cosmetic cleanups along with the actual bug fix.
I'll take a look this afternoon and put it in.
regards, tom lane
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > IIRC I made a few cosmetic cleanups along with the actual bug fix. > I'll take a look this afternoon and put it in. Thanks. -- Guillaume