Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date
Msg-id 200805291441.m4TEfpb17758@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
> >> to get them finished up and sent in...
> 
> > Has the s/\x09/    /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> > backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.
> 
> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK.  What's the consensus,
> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?

I think everyone but me wanted it backpatched, so let's do it.  I have
posted both patches but I am unable to apply your additions becuause I
don't understand them well enough.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems
Next
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases