Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date
Msg-id 26571.1212070478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
>> to get them finished up and sent in...

> Has the s/\x09/    /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.

No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK.  What's the consensus,
do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Justin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems