Thread: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Scheduale
Just to keep everyone in the loop at what we are looking at right now. RC4 - Packaged tonight, Announced Friday AM Full Release - Packaged Monday Night, PR/Announce Tuesday AM If *anyone* is sitting on something, plesae let us know ASAP ... I'm planning on packaging up RC4 tonight around 1am GMT (around 9pm my time, around 5pm Josh's (Pacific) time, if I recall my time zone's correctly) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>Just to keep everyone in the loop at what we are looking at right now. > >RC4 - Packaged tonight, Announced Friday AM >Full Release - Packaged Monday Night, PR/Announce Tuesday AM > >If *anyone* is sitting on something, plesae let us know ASAP ... I'm >planning on packaging up RC4 tonight around 1am GMT (around >9pm my time, >around 5pm Josh's (Pacific) time, if I recall my time zone's correctly) As long as the APPDATA-files-on-win32 is finished off, I'm fine. Seems Tom is on that right now, so I don't doubti t will be. Just a thought - considering it's just a weekend in between, isn't the time between RC4 and release a little bit on the shortside? I mean, not a lot of people will have time to test it "for real" in that time... While there aren't any large changes, it never hurts to be on the safe side? (Remember - there is always a bit of a delay before packagers pick it up. I know there is at least for the MSI package for windows, but I'm sure there also is for RPM etc. So people running off those will have even less time to test..) I'm definitly not saying drag this out a long time, but perhaps two more days or so? //Magnus
> Just a thought - considering it's just a weekend in between, isn't the > time between RC4 and release a little bit on the shortside? I mean, not > a lot of people will have time to test it "for real" in that time... > While there aren't any large changes, it never hurts to be on the safe > side? > (Remember - there is always a bit of a delay before packagers pick it > up. I know there is at least for the MSI package for windows, but I'm > sure there also is for RPM etc. So people running off those will have > even less time to test..) > I'm definitly not saying drag this out a long time, but perhaps two more > days or so? Why not just release rc4 and wait a week. Then 8.0 would be released next friday. J > > > //Magnus > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP. Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment
Magnus Hagander wrote: > >Just to keep everyone in the loop at what we are looking at right now. > > > >RC4 - Packaged tonight, Announced Friday AM > >Full Release - Packaged Monday Night, PR/Announce Tuesday AM > > > >If *anyone* is sitting on something, plesae let us know ASAP ... I'm > >planning on packaging up RC4 tonight around 1am GMT (around > >9pm my time, > >around 5pm Josh's (Pacific) time, if I recall my time zone's correctly) > > As long as the APPDATA-files-on-win32 is finished off, I'm fine. Seems > Tom is on that right now, so I don't doubti t will be. > > Just a thought - considering it's just a weekend in between, isn't the > time between RC4 and release a little bit on the shortside? I mean, not > a lot of people will have time to test it "for real" in that time... > While there aren't any large changes, it never hurts to be on the safe > side? > (Remember - there is always a bit of a delay before packagers pick it > up. I know there is at least for the MSI package for windows, but I'm > sure there also is for RPM etc. So people running off those will have > even less time to test..) > I'm definitly not saying drag this out a long time, but perhaps two more > days or so? I agree Magnus has a point here. We just did major changes for Win32 configuration file locations and it seems it is a mistake to not have sufficient time for testing and to see if something else comes up. I think we should shoot for the end of next week. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Just to keep everyone in the loop at what we are looking at right now. >>> >>> RC4 - Packaged tonight, Announced Friday AM >>> Full Release - Packaged Monday Night, PR/Announce Tuesday AM >>> >>> If *anyone* is sitting on something, plesae let us know ASAP ... I'm >>> planning on packaging up RC4 tonight around 1am GMT (around >>> 9pm my time, >>> around 5pm Josh's (Pacific) time, if I recall my time zone's correctly) >> >> As long as the APPDATA-files-on-win32 is finished off, I'm fine. Seems >> Tom is on that right now, so I don't doubti t will be. >> >> Just a thought - considering it's just a weekend in between, isn't the >> time between RC4 and release a little bit on the shortside? I mean, not >> a lot of people will have time to test it "for real" in that time... >> While there aren't any large changes, it never hurts to be on the safe >> side? >> (Remember - there is always a bit of a delay before packagers pick it >> up. I know there is at least for the MSI package for windows, but I'm >> sure there also is for RPM etc. So people running off those will have >> even less time to test..) >> I'm definitly not saying drag this out a long time, but perhaps two more >> days or so? > > I agree Magnus has a point here. We just did major changes for Win32 > configuration file locations and it seems it is a mistake to not have > sufficient time for testing and to see if something else comes up. > > I think we should shoot for the end of next week. I'm the last person to argue against delaying to get it right :) But, if we are going to delay to end of week, why not just make it a Sun package, Mon release, so that Josh et al can get the best bang for the PR/release announcement? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
> > I'm the last person to argue against delaying to get it right :) But, > if we are going to delay to end of week, why not just make it a Sun > package, Mon release, so that Josh et al can get the best bang for the > PR/release announcement? > I think that we would then want a tuesday release. It is my experience that Monday releases don't get much exposure... people are trying to catch up after the weekend. However I do like the theory :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment
On Jan 7, 2005, at 15:44, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> I'm the last person to argue against delaying to get it right :) >> But, if we are going to delay to end of week, why not just make it a >> Sun package, Mon release, so that Josh et al can get the best bang >> for the PR/release announcement? >> > I think that we would then want a tuesday release. It is my experience > that Monday releases don't get much exposure... people are trying to > catch up after the weekend. Having the release earlier in the week also means there will probably be more people online to quickly respond to any issues that arise with the release. Then again, it also means its more likely more people will be exposed to any such issues as well. Weighing the two, I'd think former is preferable to the latter. (Not that there'll be any issues anyway :) Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
Michael Glaesemann wrote: > Having the release earlier in the week also means there will probably be > more people online to quickly respond to any issues that arise with the > release. Then again, it also means its more likely more people will be > exposed to any such issues as well. Weighing the two, I'd think former > is preferable to the latter. (Not that there'll be any issues anyway :) > The spirit of the expression "Friday afternoon car" translated to Swedish would be captured by "Måndagsexemplar" (made on a monday), since we consider things made on Mondays to have a particular bad quality. Don't know why really, perhaps we've forgotten that weekends are for rest and recreation :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I agree Magnus has a point here. We just did major changes for Win32
>> configuration file locations and it seems it is a mistake to not have
>> sufficient time for testing and to see if something else comes up.
>>
>> I think we should shoot for the end of next week.
> I'm the last person to argue against delaying to get it right :) But, if
> we are going to delay to end of week, why not just make it a Sun package,
> Mon release, so that Josh et al can get the best bang for the PR/release
> announcement?
I think those were actually quite minor changes and are already fully
tested ;-). I see no need to slip a week for it.
If there had been significant changes between RC3 and RC4 then I would
agree we need a full week; but in practice the testing that was done on
RC3 counts too. So I think we are fine with release next week rather
than the week after. And I for one want to get this sucker out the
door...
regards, tom lane