Thread: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
found 37 messages that need review:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3

I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 

Thanks.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
"Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Bruce Momjian wrote:

>I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
>period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
>found 37 messages that need review:
>
>    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
>
>I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 
>  
>

I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4.   
It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since 
a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c) 
having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea.

Matthew



Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> >I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> >period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
> >found 37 messages that need review:
> >
> >    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> >
> >I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 
> >  
> >
> 
> I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4.   
> It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since 
> a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c) 
> having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea.

These are 8.0 patches, like from 7.4 beta.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
Fabien COELHO
Date:
Dear Bruce,

> I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
> found 37 messages that need review:
>
>     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3

I'm to submit a small patch to add missing include files plus one library 
for pgxs under win32. I hope to do it on Saturday.

-- 
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr


Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
> found 37 messages that need review:
>     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 

AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just
work-in-progress that never got completed.  I don't think you need to
hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply.
        regards, tom lane


Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> > period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
> > found 37 messages that need review:
> >     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> > I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 
> 
> AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just
> work-in-progress that never got completed.  I don't think you need to
> hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply.

Just confirming that we don't need to keep those emails that talk about:
index correlationbinary copy toolsupdatable cursorshold cursorsdatacube patchplpq for dblinklanginfo for
languages-specificto_char(date)libpq support for precision/scalepackages support
 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073