Thread: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches
I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and found 37 messages that need review: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
Bruce Momjian wrote: >I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta >period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and >found 37 messages that need review: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 > >I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. > > I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4. It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c) having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea. Matthew
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta > >period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and > >found 37 messages that need review: > > > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 > > > >I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. > > > > > > I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4. > It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since > a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c) > having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea. These are 8.0 patches, like from 7.4 beta. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
Dear Bruce, > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta > period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and > found 37 messages that need review: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 I'm to submit a small patch to add missing include files plus one library for pgxs under win32. I hope to do it on Saturday. -- Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta > period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and > found 37 messages that need review: > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 > I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just work-in-progress that never got completed. I don't think you need to hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta > > period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and > > found 37 messages that need review: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3 > > I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. > > AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just > work-in-progress that never got completed. I don't think you need to > hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply. Just confirming that we don't need to keep those emails that talk about: index correlationbinary copy toolsupdatable cursorshold cursorsdatacube patchplpq for dblinklanginfo for languages-specificto_char(date)libpq support for precision/scalepackages support -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073