Thread: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Robert Treat
Date:
Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
(linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

Robert Treat

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David De Graff" <postgresql@awarehouse.com>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>;
<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?


> The Internet Society (ISOC) won the bid to replace Verisign as the
.org
> registry. They're going to subcontract to Afilias, who has been
running the
> .info registry.
> 
> See:
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-14oct02.htm
> http://www.afilias.info/about_afilias/dotorg/index_html
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23669-2002Oct14.html
> 
> Is this the same group that recently asked for input on their
proposal,
> which specified Postgres as the registry database?
> 
> (For some reason I can't find the recent thread on their proposal on
the
> hackers, general or admin lists.)
> 
> Dave De Graff






Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
"scott.marlowe"
Date:
It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
Postgresql.

On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:

> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
> 
> Robert Treat
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David De Graff" <postgresql@awarehouse.com>
> To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>;
> <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:42 PM
> Subject: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
> 
> 
> > The Internet Society (ISOC) won the bid to replace Verisign as the
> .org
> > registry. They're going to subcontract to Afilias, who has been
> running the
> > .info registry.
> > 
> > See:
> > http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-14oct02.htm
> > http://www.afilias.info/about_afilias/dotorg/index_html
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23669-2002Oct14.html
> > 
> > Is this the same group that recently asked for input on their
> proposal,
> > which specified Postgres as the registry database?
> > 
> > (For some reason I can't find the recent thread on their proposal on
> the
> > hackers, general or admin lists.)
> > 
> > Dave De Graff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 



Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Lamar Owen
Date:
On Monday 14 October 2002 04:08 pm, Robert Treat wrote:
> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

I have submitted a story to LinuxToday.  We'll see how that goes.  Anyone want 
to take on Slashdot? :-)
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Robert Treat wrote:
> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

Yes, this is a huge win, and something for our advocacy site, and for
the main PostgreSQL page too.  Vince?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Jeff Davis
Date:
> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
>
> Robert Treat

Don't worry about Oracle, they don't need real customers. Their database
market consists of a healthy balance of real and fictitious people. See
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/04/17/179252.shtml?tid=98

Regards,Jeff Davis


Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Karl DeBisschop
Date:
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
> Postgresql.
> 
> On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> 
> > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?

--
Karl



Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
Mike Mascari
Date:
Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> 
>>It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
>>Postgresql.
>>
>>On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
>>>especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
>>>PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
>>>(linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
>>>marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
>>
> 
> Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?

Here's the Oracle statement:

http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html

Hope that helps,

Mike Mascari
mascarm@mascari.com



Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From
"scott.marlowe"
Date:
The slashdot article: 
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/14/1720241&mode=nested&tid=95

The isoc page:  http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/

the isoc proposal:

http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/10-1.shtml

the Oracle post:

http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html

Good day.


On 16 Oct 2002, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
> > Postgresql.
> > 
> > On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> > 
> > > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
> 
> Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?
> 
> --
> Karl
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>