Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karl DeBisschop
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date
Msg-id 1034795177.1089.3.camel@miles.debisschop.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
> Postgresql.
> 
> On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> 
> > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?

--
Karl



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Curtis Faith"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Next
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?