Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0210161322300.1431-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?  (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@alert.infoplease.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
The slashdot article: 
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/14/1720241&mode=nested&tid=95

The isoc page:  http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/

the isoc proposal:

http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/10-1.shtml

the Oracle post:

http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html

Good day.


On 16 Oct 2002, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of 
> > Postgresql.
> > 
> > On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> > 
> > > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> > > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> > > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> > > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
> 
> Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement?
> 
> --
> Karl
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Next
From: Thomas Swan
Date:
Subject: Re: v7.3 Branched ...