Thread: A celebrity among us :-)
Well, at the risk of embarrassing our esteemed Bug Fixer Extraordinaire, after verifying that it is, indeed, the same man, Kudos to the 7th most prolific open-source author in the world THOMAS G LANE!!! http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. Good for grins, if nothing else. I think they are counting by actual bytes of source code contributed (however they measure that -- probably, in most cases, by copyright notices.). In any case, hoorays for Tom Lane (and for the rest of the Free Software community). It is unfortunate, however, that the PostgreSQL project isn't counted amongst his contributees. (Tom, yes I _did_ have to do that... :-) :-) ). Of course, that is not meant to belittle anyone at all.... as all the developers here have contributed valuable features and fixes to the best Free RDBMS around. (InterBase is not likely to ever be 'Free' in that 'Free Software' sense of the word -- open source does not mean 'Free!') -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
On Sun, 07 May 2000, Lamar Owen wrote: > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. Incidentally, PostgreSQL (6.5.3) is listed, at the following url: http://orbiten.org/ofss/codd-render.cgi?action=project&codd=results/may2000/freshmeat-05012000/postgresql-6.5.3.codd -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Lamar Owen wrote: > > Well, at the risk of embarrassing our esteemed Bug Fixer Extraordinaire, after > verifying that it is, indeed, the same man, Kudos to the 7th most prolific > open-source author in the world THOMAS G LANE!!! > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. > Now I know who to contact for all my Discrete Cosine Transform questions. > Good for grins, if nothing else. I think they are counting by actual bytes of > source code contributed (however they measure that -- probably, in most cases, > by copyright notices.). In any case, hoorays for Tom Lane (and for the rest of > the Free Software community). It is unfortunate, however, that the PostgreSQL > project isn't counted amongst his contributees. Just glancing through the CVS logs leads me to believe that, with PostgreSQL, maybe it should go: 1. FSF 2. Sun Microsystems 3. Tom Lane 4. UCLA Just my humble opinion, of course :-) Mike Mascari
> On Sun, 07 May 2000, Lamar Owen wrote: > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. > > Incidentally, PostgreSQL (6.5.3) is listed, at the following url: > http://orbiten.org/ofss/codd-render.cgi?action=project&codd=results/may2000/freshmeat-05012000/postgresql-6.5.3.codd OK, I see it. Now, what is it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
> > On Sun, 07 May 2000, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. > > > > Incidentally, PostgreSQL (6.5.3) is listed, at the following url: > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/codd-render.cgi?action=project&codd=results/may2000/freshmeat-05012000/postgresql-6.5.3.codd > > OK, I see it. Now, what is it? OK, I see now. Wow, Tom Lane is up there. How can I be 143? I even show up in Krunning, and I have never heard of it. Also remember that my CVS commit shows up for any patch that does not have CVS commit privs, so it is overstated. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
> > > On Sun, 07 May 2000, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. > > > > > > Incidentally, PostgreSQL (6.5.3) is listed, at the following url: > > > http://orbiten.org/ofss/codd-render.cgi?action=project&codd=results/may2000/freshmeat-05012000/postgresql-6.5.3.codd > > > > OK, I see it. Now, what is it? > > OK, I see now. Wow, Tom Lane is up there. How can I be 143? I even > show up in Krunning, and I have never heard of it. Also remember that > my CVS commit shows up for any patch that does not have CVS commit > privs, so it is overstated. Man, Tom Lane has 17 projects under his name. Wow. Is that all jpeg stuff, Tom? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html for reference. > Good for grins, if nothing else. And little else. I think the reason I'm up there is just that there are a ton of open-source programs that have incorporated libjpeg. AFAICT the survey just counted copyright notices appearing in open-source distributions; so if your code appears in N programs you get N times as much credit as you should. I certainly don't have more lines of open source circulating than MIT does... > (Tom, yes I _did_ have to do that... :-) :-) ). No you didn't... this survey is too bogus to deserve quoting. (If they're going to treat groups like FSF and the entire UC system as a single author, and *draw conclusions that are stated as though they believed FSF and UC are single authors*, what use is it? They have a lot of work to do.) regards, tom lane organizer, Independent JPEG Group