Thread: added long long to BSDI
I have found BSDI used %qd for long long, while gnulibc used %Ld. I have changed HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 to be HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_Ld and added HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_qd, and added the proper changes. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
> I have found BSDI used %qd for long long, while gnulibc used %Ld. I
> have changed HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 to be HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_Ld and
> added HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_qd, and added the proper changes.
But the code no longer uses "%Ld", using "%lld" instead to be compatible
with both gnu and with AIX. Is that still the case? If so, then perhaps
we should have a different name...
Good news on BSDI though. We have the 64-bit ints for ~6 platforms now?
From what I can recall, Linux/i86, Linux/sparc, Linux/alpha, Unix/alpha,
BSDI/i86, and AIX are supported? How about FreeBSD? Any other platforms?
- Tom
> > I have found BSDI used %qd for long long, while gnulibc used %Ld. I > > have changed HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 to be HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_Ld and > > added HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_qd, and added the proper changes. > > But the code no longer uses "%Ld", using "%lld" instead to be compatible > with both gnu and with AIX. Is that still the case? If so, then perhaps > we should have a different name... > > Good news on BSDI though. We have the 64-bit ints for ~6 platforms now? > >From what I can recall, Linux/i86, Linux/sparc, Linux/alpha, Unix/alpha, > BSDI/i86, and AIX are supported? How about FreeBSD? Any other platforms? OK, I can change the name and code, but the configure test used %Ld, and the code used %lld. Sure you want to change it? -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > I have found BSDI used %qd for long long, while gnulibc used %Ld. I > have changed HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 to be HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_Ld and > added HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64_qd, and added the proper changes. Just to add to the confusion, the SCO UDK (used in UnixWare and Open Server) uses %lld for long long. Fortunately, it will also accept %Ld, so we don't have to add another HACVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 variant. -- ____ | Billy G. Allie | Domain....: Bill.Allie@mug.org | /| | 7436 Hartwell | Compuserve: 76337,2061 |-/-|----- | Dearborn, MI 48126| MSN.......: B_G_Allie@email.msn.com |/ |LLIE | (313) 582-1540 |
> OK, I can change the name and code, but the configure test used %Ld,
> and the code used %lld. Sure you want to change it?
Ah, I'd forgotten about the configure test (someone else did that one,
Tom Lane I think?). That should be changed to "%lld" also.
Can you do that?
- Tom
> > OK, I can change the name and code, but the configure test used %Ld, > > and the code used %lld. Sure you want to change it? > > Ah, I'd forgotten about the configure test (someone else did that one, > Tom Lane I think?). That should be changed to "%lld" also. > > Can you do that? > > - Tom > Doing it now. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)